The growing number of high-performance ICs--with greater
functional complexity, higher integration, and improved per-
formance--continues to create a higher standard for IC packaging. In
response, advanced interconnect technologies, such as flex-based
circuits and tape ball-grid arrays (TBGAs) have stepped up to the
plate. With significantly improved electrical and thermal
performance over older IC interconnect methods, TBGAs, like other
enhanced BGA packages, are becoming ever-more popular.
Recent tests have demonstrated the TBGA's strengths with respect
to integration levels, defect levels, joint reliability, and thermal
and electrical performance. While the results are highly
encouraging, migrating to a new format is never a cut-and-dry
decision, as a number of factors must be taken into account. Chief
among these is overall cost, mainly affected by the format's
compatibility with the existing manufacturing infrastructure. Due to
its compatibility with surface-mount-construction techniques, the
TBGA may have the edge over competing packaged options.
Why BGA?
For IC interconnect
packages, plastic packages with gull-wing leads--particularly
small-outline IC (SOIC) and quad flat pack (QFP)--represent the
majority of surface-mount-technology (SMT) compatible first-level
packages in use today. In the near future, they will continue to be
the packages of choice for first-level IC packages. However there
are newer alternatives that offer designers an option, and one of
those is the BGA.
The reasons for the rising popularity of BGAs are simple: They
offer higher reliability, a smaller form factor, improved electrical
and thermal performance, and more. According to the Worldwide IC
Packaging Market publication, the relatively new BGA will grow
by more than a factor of 10, from 0.319-billion packages in 1996 to
3.269 billion in 2001.
Within the BGA family, there are three alternatives: plastic BGA
(PBGA), ceramic BGA (CBGA), and TBGA (see the
figure). Defined as any BGA package which uses flex circuitry as
the substrate, the TBGA delivers many of the advantages of its
cousins, and is expected to be a major player within the rapidly
growing BGA product family.
TBGA (also called a flex-circuit-based BGA) can include larger
high-lead-count packages, as well as small, chip-scale packages
(CSPs). The superior wiring density of flex circuitry endows the
TBGA with all the advantages of regular BGAs, and then some. With
capability rapidly approaching 25-µm lines and spaces, a ball-array
pattern that would normally require two, or even four layers of
circuit board to route can now be accomplished on a single layer of
flex circuitry. Consequently, the form factor and cost/performance
ratio can be considerably more attractive than other packages.
A die can be interconnected to a flex circuit through any of the
three conventional methods: wire bonding, thermal-compression
bonding, or flip-chip attachment. Fine-pitch flex offers obvious
advantages when interconnecting with the latter two methods, while
offering improved wire-bonding capabilities.
Wire-bond pads on the flex can be positioned closer together, and
therefore, moved closer to the die itself. As a result, the required
length of wire can be minimized, which offers a reduction in
assembly cost and an improvement in electrical performance.
TBGA Formats
TBGAs can be
classified into two main categories:
Cavity down. Here, solder balls fan out away from the edge
of the die, and a heat spreader is used for high-power dissipation.
The cavity-down format is an excellent solution for higher-I/O
applications (above 200) requiring thermal dissipation of over 3 W.
Applications for cavity-down formats include higher-end digital
signal processors, network routers, microprocessors,
microcontrollers, programmable logic, and a variety of
application-specific ICs.
Cavity up. In the cavity-up format, solder balls can fan
in under the die, and in some cases actually become a CSP, or
near-CSP package. Cavity-up products are ideally suited for
applications requiring a smaller form factor. This would include
packaged die for cell phones, pagers, video cameras, digital
cameras, and handheld devices.
TBGAs will displace the other more widely-used, gull-wing lead
packages in many applications within two to five years, mainly
because of:
Increasing lead counts. As lead counts continue to grow,
the reliability of the package will become increasingly important,
especially as typical IC lead counts surpass the 208 I/O mark.
Faster devices. As devices become faster, they will
require higher levels of thermal and electrical performance. Here
again, TBGA holds an advantage, not only compared to gull-wing
packages, but also compared to plastic packaging, including PBGA.
Mobile electronics and the demand for space. The explosion
of small mobile electronics will increase the demand for more
functionality in a small form factor. The CSP- or near-CSP-style
flex-based BGAs have a form factor, significantly smaller than SOIC,
with a higher I/O density than PBGAs.
TBGA Implementation
When
evaluating new technological solutions such as TBGA, it is important
for the designer to examine total applied costs. If new packaging
technologies require significant investments in manufacturing
infrastructure, they likely will not be accepted by designers.
Cost-effective solutions must include compatibility with the
existing infrastructure, both at the board level and at the IC
packaging-assembly operation level.
Compatibility with SMT assembly techniques allows
high-performance, wire-bond TBGAs to meet the applied-cost
challenges because minimal new infrastructure investment is
required. Because approximately 97% of die are currently wire
bonded, a vast infrastructure for wire bonding is already in place..
TBGA carriers can be supplied in strip format similar to a leadframe
or PBGA. This format allows assemblers to easily use the existing
infrastructure for die attach, wire bonding, overmold or
encapsulation, and ball attach. Compatibility is furthered by the
fact that circuits for cavity-up applications are typically
connected to a carrier, enabling the package to be used in the most
cost-efficient assembly operations without significant additional
costs for manufacturing infrastructure. |